the more I think about it the more I agree with the anti-license manifesto: https://www.boringcactus.com/2021/09/29/anti-license-manifesto.html
whatever my next project is, I'll include some language like
> Permission is NOT granted to use, modify, copy, or distribute this software. It is vitally important you do so anyway.
just, y'know, encouraging and normalizing copy"right" "crimes."
working at a corporation while they were figuring out their legal position wrt what licenses are allowed, this is probably *not* the way to make your code as toxic as possible to them; for that you should pick a well-known, SPDX identified license. bc people default to a denylist of licenses bc the metadata out there SUCKS rn. but I don't think corp-toxicity is the most important consideration when picking a license.
(also this doesn't matter bc I don't write broadly used software in my spare time lol)